☰

Polls

Poll: Update Profile Page Design

by

Earlier this year, we did a poll to ask you, the visitor, which features you’d like to see most. We are going to work on the two most requested features this year (profile attributes & improved design). Since the attributes require some tweaks to the design, we’re going to focus on the profile page design first. 

The main goal of the profile page design is to make the top section more user-friendly, especially on mobile devices. 

Right now, the profile page design is in a test phase. We already showed it to a small group of visitors a couple of weeks ago and gave them the option to leave feedback. We took some of the feedback and implemented it. Some other feedback was contradictory – One user wanted something, while another wanted the opposite. So we think it’s time for a poll.

But first, we need to show it to you. You can test it on any profile page by replacing /babe/ in the URL with /babenew/ but here are quick examples:
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Cristy_Ren => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Cristy_Ren
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Karolina_Szymczak => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Karolina_Szymczak
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Salome_Larrea_Munoz => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Salome_Larrea_Munoz
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Cumatozz => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Cumatozz

And some incomplete profiles:
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Talise_Harris => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Talise_Harris (2 photos)
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Suzanne_Grandais => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Suzanne_Grandais (1 photo)
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/Teresa_Seppala => https://www.babepedia.com/babenew/Teresa_Seppala (0 photos)

Now onto the poll:

Overall impression - Do you think this new profile page design is an improvement?

What do you think about the rating widget? The new one requires 3 clicks, while the old one only needs 1 click. But the new one does take up less space.

The biggest change is on mobile, where the photos are now shown with a horizontal scroller. Did you test it and do you like it?

For the biography fields, we opted for a 1 or 2-column display (depending on the screen size) and a grouping in sections (personal, body, ...).

Do you like this?

We are thinking of merging the performances section (for pornstars) with the biography fields. This is visible on this profile page for example. Do you like this? 

If you have any specific feedback, want to clarify your opinion or find bugs, please use the comments section.new

Poll: Which of these Babepedia features do you want to see most in 2025?

by

Last year, we held a poll to ask you, our users, what feature they would like to see most. We picked a few and implemented two items from the top 3 (Improved bra/cup size handling and Personal top 10 rankings). 

This year, we want to do it again.  We have compiled a new list based on our ideas and the best ideas from the ideas page. Please pick one and submit your vote. Also, please drop your opinion in the comments section. If you want to vote for more than one idea, simply post it in the comment section, and we’ll take it into consideration.

Last year, the Photo Ratings idea was a favorite of many. We implemented it but were unhappy with how it works, so we put it “on hold” for now and have included a variation in the poll below.  

The options are:

  • Photo Ratings (Revised) – This revision of last year’s idea. We want to allow the users to rate the profile page photos on the site with a thumbs up/down. We don’t want to clutter the current photo viewer with a voting system, so we would add a separate “Photo rating” page where you can view and rate all the photos. Only registered users can vote here. In the second phase, trusted members with a history of contributions can change or remove photos with a certain threshold.
  • Profile Attributes/Tags – Users can attach attributes or tags to profile pages. It is very broad and used for things currently not on the page. We can use it for hobbies (dog lover, car enthusiast, …), skills (polyglot, martial arts, …), general physical attributes (curly hair, pale skin, birthmark, …), breasts (size, shape, firmness, areolas, nipples, …), and more. We can then integrate that it into the advanced search engine and OnlyFans search and make a lot more lists. 
  • Social Network Features – Bring some social network features to the site, such as avatars (user photos), adding friends, private messaging, …
  • Improving The Site Design – Improving the site with changes here and there, mainly focusing on the advanced search and profile pages.
  • New Site Design – Similar to the previous item but going further. Think of it like a complete makeover.
  • Chatbox – Some discussions on the site tend to go off-topic. We can add a dedicated chatbox where users can go off-topic. We can go even further and make it like a message board/forum.

Update (March 24): We’re closing the poll today. We have a clear winner and two that are pretty close. We’ll work on these in the coming months. Thanks to everyone who voted and contributed in the comments.

Which of these Babepedia features do you want to see most?

Profile Attributes/Tags
37.71%
Improving The Site Design
19.96%
Photo Ratings (Revised)
19.59%
New Site Design
12.75%
Social Network Features
7.21%
Chatbox
2.77%

Poll: Transgenders on Babepedia in 2025? – The results

by

In February of last year, we published a poll to ask our users about their opinions about transgender people. In retrospect, we made a couple of mistakes here. First, some argued that it should’ve been a simple yes/no question instead of having two yes options. Second, the poll software allowed tech-savvy users to vote multiple times, which we believe happened many times. Third, we didn’t change our policy or communicate properly after the poll concluded. This is causing some frustration among users. So we’ve decided to run a new poll for a few days.

Poll results

The poll ran from January 17 to January 20. We received 372 votes from registered users. A handful of “no” votes were rejected because some users still tried to vote multiple times (using multiple accounts). These didn’t affect the outcome much. Here are the results:

Read more