Melinda Windsor

Also incorrect. You seem to have fully failed to catch what I said. the CUP LETTER, be it an E cup or D cup etc, is the difference in inches between band and bust size. But a 28DD and 38DD are very different. Because of the band size difference of 10 inches. Though usually a 40 or 38DD is on an obese or overweight woman, unhealthy, unless she is 6ft or taller. Otherwise it is less than 38 band size. THAT is what makes the VOLUME larger. The fact you failed completely to pick up on this obvious fact in my previous message shows yet again that you don't understand what 34DD looks like. She is very obviously not a 38DD, but also obviously not a 30DD either. The VOLUME of the breast, which you brought up, is what the band size number determines, not the cup LETTER. the letter gives you the inch difference of band and bust, protrusion of the breast, not the volume. Volume itself is based on band size and thus bust size in NUMBERS. Clearly it is you who is one-dimensional in your thinking if you don't even understand what the volume of the breast is based on. That is what gives it the size. This was clearly pointed out in my previous message as well. And also the measurement is always based on how much it points out from the profile, the side. So it can be as large and wide as you want, but if it is shallow, sagging also so much that it will not amount to 5 or 6 or even 4 inches in difference, then she won't even be a D cup. It is the measurement of how much it sticks out, including on the sides towards armpits, not only the front of the breast, so root width won't matter if it is too shallow and sags so much that there's barely any inch difference between band and bust.

A narrow root won't automatically guarantee a large cup size nor even the illusion of a bigger breast if it is shallow still and sags. Versus a wider root,but firmer and thus more inches in between,a bigger cup size. And ultimately the ones with a wider root in that case will always look bigger, despite the other woman having a narrower root base. It is not just one single thing, however the only 2 things that matter are the difference of band and bust in inches and the actual numbers themselves, because the bigger the number, the bigger the volume! This is why a 36D and 34DD bras can often fit both,even if not ideally, considered sister sizes/twin sizes. But a 40A will always be a much smaller breast than a 30DD, so the letter ,in the long run, matters more than the numbers(especially when the band size is large due to obesity simply,where barely any curves are seen). The flatter and wider root is what Janet Lupo had, for example, with 34F(DDD) cup(later in life a 36G cup, as her autographed and signed her own bra she wore in early 00s, meaning 42 or 43 inches bust, and 35-36 band size, a G cup is 7 inches difference), bust measured at 39, so a band size of 33(they wear 34F). Another example would be a 5'3 flat height for Cynthia Myers, who had an F aka DD cup, but they DO NOT look more compressed or larger on her compared to the same on a 5'8 woman like Marylin Lange,say( especially since they both have the same band size!). The so called torpedo tits on Cynthia( mostly due to men not realizing she squished them together with her arms in certain positions to make them point out that way, but they were still quite perky on their own, but not torpedo shaped like some women though), one could easily tell that desite a narrower root, her breasts,especially from the side, were smaller than those of Cynthia Myers or Marylin Lange or Karen Price or Petra Verkaik( who men ,speaking of 1989 here, assumed was more than her DD cup, but they were perkier than Janet Lupo,so the rookie wouldn't know), but seeing breasts under gravity when on all fours is often a good example also, for overall volume observations.

Bottom line: the tape measure is the main thing. A C cup will always look smaller than a DDD cup, even if the band sizes differ by 10 inches, even if the DDD cup sags and is on a wide root vs narrow root of the C cup woman. However when it comes to 1 cup size differences, THEN an untrained eye can be tricked if the smaller cup size has a bigger band size( 36D vs 32DD for example) AND is on a narrower root. That much is true. But overall, largely speaking, it is easy to tell the cup size, especially if you know the band size first.
So with Melinda, taking all that into consideration, it does not mistify at all to know she is a 34DD, she looks it. I never assumed her to be an F cup, nor did I ever see,say, a 38DD cup there, I guesstimated her to be about 32-34DD OR 36D, based on her frame and shape and low and behold I hit the nail on the head when I saw her measurements after. And yet you have 99% of men on this site thinking every woman is a G or H cup whenever they see a perky DD or even simply a D cup. It's hilarious how vast majority of men are clueless beyond belief. At least you know there's a band and bust size and how the LETTER is derived. That's more than most.

Posted by EternalFreedomDharmaReply0 22026-06-04 17:27 (edited 2026-06-04 17:55)  🛈  ⚠

that's also incorrect. Look up basic stats. There are significantly MORE women aged 18-34 in 2020s than ANY other decade in U.S. history. You seem ignorant, the birth rate in the 1930s and 40s was lower than it was in the 90s and 00s, significantly less, that is the totaly fertility rate of kids per woman. Baby boomers are the 1946-1964 period, yet after 1964 and throughout the lte 60s,70s and early 80s there were less birth per woman than late 80s onwards. The statistics are available.
In fact if we take away all immigration(look up the data!) and only look at births of locals who always had generations in USA:
1949-1964 - 65.059 million kids were born
1965-1980 - 54.910 million kids were born
1981-1996 - 61.973 million kids were born
1997-2012 - 65.094 million kids were born
2013-2028 - current projections show over 62 million will be born
Each period is an official period for a generation,from boomers,gen X,gen Y,gen X and gen ALpha.

Gen X are only 84.40% of boomer amount(not taking 1946-1948 into account, since all periods must be 16 years!)
Gen Y are 112.86% of gen X amount! Meaning way more! People had least kids in the 60s and 70s by far among whites.
Ge Z are 105.04% OF Gen Y amount! Biggest generation EVER, in raw numbers, are currently 13-29 years old!
Gen Alpha will be over 96% of gen Z and over 96% of boomers. Which is still way better than boomers had to contend with regarding gen X!.

Gen Alpha will be MORE than millenials a bit. So people making up lies about people giving birth less( not counting migrants here, separate diagrams! Look it up! official government data for many decades now!)
Gen Alpha itself is 113.457% of gen X...and yet no collapse occurred in 1981 nor 1991, nor 2001 nor 2011 nor 2026 (gen X being 45-61 years old).. Gen Alpha is born 2013-2028...which means we will have more young white women in 30 years than we did back in the 00s or 80s or 60s! ) Instead of fantasies, look up data, ignore the migration data and focus on local and white. Do the maths! And add to it the fact there are 3 times more people now than in 1926. And it was exactly twice less in summer 1957. And if you take away the migration(both in and out) nowadays, you're still left with way more people, whites includes, than EVER in U.S. history.

Posted by EternalFreedomDharmaReply0 32026-06-03 12:20  🛈  ⚠

European is not an ethnicity lol. Do you even know what you're talking about? Russians, Portuguese, Italians, Albanians, Greeks, Finns, Irish, Icelanders, Norwegians, French, Spanish, German, Slovenian, Romanian, Polish, English, Latvian, Swiss, Turkish even etc are all europeans. Their cultures are vastly different and many of them can't stand each other( like Poles and Brits, or french and germans, or even within Belgium and Holland itself, wanting to separate into 2 states for many decades!)...they look extremely different. That's like calling Chinese and Japanese the same ethnicity. She's American, and European is not an ethnicity. Call her white if you don't know her ethnicity. or caucasoid, which is the correct scientific term.

Posted by EternalFreedomDharmaReply0 32026-06-03 12:23  🛈  ⚠