Posted

Contribute: Removal of photos

Content Images Moderation Profile

Posted by Pingupop 2026-09-28 00:50

People are way too eager to remove photos even when there are more available spots for new photos. What is the point of this?

My suggestion is that users should not be allowed to remove photos from a profile unless they are exact duplicates.

Look at case 5714 and 5715. Granted they "only" show the girls holes, but someone added the photos at some point and they were accepted, so why can someone just remove them because they don't like them when there is plenty of room for them to add more photos?

Comments (7)

Limiting photo removal suggestions to duplicates is too restrictive. There are many good reasons to remove a photo (wrong profile, low quality, ...).

The line between user misinterpretation of our guidelines and a valid reason is blurred here.
We don't block faceless photos when it's clearly the model (showing face is only required for main profile photos), but he does add that there are already enough similar photos.
Also, 9 others voted "approve" on both 5715 and 5714. Not sure if they agreed with the need for more variation, or they just blindly approved.

@Genseyboy2, please drop by. This is your photo proposal.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-09-29 15:42

I was about to communicate you to give a warning like the removing for "older photo".
A bunch really misunderstand this , but didn't feel escalated that bad, but yeah, probably better to do it sooner than later.

Posted by wpgoar 2026-09-29 18:02

@Pryda My main point here is that people are removing legitimate photos on profiles that are not "full" just because they don't like them. And I'm not convinced that people are even looking at the photos/profile at all before clicking 'Approve'. Like mentioned elsewhere, things happen so fast there is no way the people voting are checking anything before they do. And 'Approve' seems to be the default.

Posted by Pingupop 2026-09-29 22:24

Why are there requests in the ‘Contribute’ section for user approval to remove underage photos? Shouldn’t these be reviewed by Babepedia administration or your legal compliance department? As a regular user, I’m not going to research the validity of these age claims, nor do I want to be held responsible for voting to keep photos when I have no true knowledge of a model’s age in any given photo. @Pryda, these don’t belong in our hands and should be handled administratively. I’ve seen a lot of these recently.

Posted by 3rdwave 2026-10-11 00:01

@Pryda Look at the following cases:

Case #7964
Case #7963

Why do these photos need to be removed when both the profiles in question have plenty of room to add more without removing them. They are "low quality", but if those are the only photos there are, why not keep them?

As image quality and resolution goes up with time, by this logic, all older images will be removed. Is that what is wanted?

Posted by Pingupop 2026-10-15 20:11

@Pingupop: Both photos are low-quality, so removal is warranted. Both profiles also have other photos and a lot more out there, so I don't see the problem.

@3rdwave: There is indeed a flag option to report underage profiles, but there is no option to flag specific photos for showing underage content. We'll work on something better to handle these.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-10-15 22:57

@Pryda Ok. You're the boss.

Posted by Pingupop 2026-10-15 23:21