Posted

Contribute: Vote for Biographical Edits

Content Moderation Profile Statistics

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-09-11 07:59

Now that photo changes and comment moderation are vote-driven, I'd like to suggest that all biographical edits are subject to user votes as well (changes to current data only, not simply filling in the blank fields... that'd be redundant and overkill). I feel like this is even more important than reporting comments, and definitely more important than voting on pictures (it'd also save the Admins some time), so I say why not?

Also, if applied, to require that the user provide a clear explanation with a set minimum character requirement.

Comments (12)

This could work, but we'd have to hold that edit until it's reviewed and display it only after it's approved. And consequent edits will have to be blocked until the voting is complete.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-09-11 21:55

@Pryda Either way, thank you for considering it

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-09-12 00:36

@Pryda I think once a biography is complete, including a minimum word count and images, the quality of the biography could be rated by vote. Better for the rating to be a word rather than a number, so it is not confused with the babe's rating.
So, if the rating is, for example 'excellent' it is limited for editing, but if the rating is, for example, 'poor' it could be highlighted to the community for upgrades. I think that this would help improve the overall standard of profiles and reduce the bickering. There would also have to be a method for updates.

Posted by jeast 2026-09-12 00:57

I mean why not their is already an editing war happening.
I would say to withhold who did the edit until after the vote

Posted by firetop22 2026-09-15 09:39

@jeast and @firetop22 are both right... The warring happens all the time, and this would save both the users and the administration a ton of time. I know I already made this point beforehand, but I don't think most users would mind people filling in the blanks without having to go through the voting process... For new pages and what not... but the "gatekeeping" has been out of control. All of the big encyclopedia and music databases have a system similar to what I'm proposing, and it keeps everyone happy overall.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-09-20 09:37

In concept, it's a good idea, but in practice I'm not so sure. Some members reject a better photo suggestion for no reason, so what's to stop them from rejecting an edit someone has worked hard on?

Posted by GoodGuyVoodoo 2026-09-20 10:01

@GoodGuyVoodoo
Is it not a step in the right direction though? No system is perfect, so all we can do is to make it better. Currently, if someone doesn't like something, they can just wipe it out, over and over again, 100% of the time. With votes, it makes that number a lot less that 100%, as it adds more variables, that being other users.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-09-20 10:13

@GoodGuyVoodoo
With the photo thing, it's because most of the ones that get rejected fail to meet one or more of the prerequisites... off-center, not from the thigh up, etc. To tell you the truth, WAY more are getting accepted than when it was up to the moderators... it used to take days to get one switched up.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-09-20 10:19

I knew this wouldn't be a popular request, as there's a lot of gatekeeping—especially with high terrific pages—but there's really no benefit from an administrative or "good faith" editing standing to not have this feature.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-09-22 06:27

@LeLoyon71 I stopped working on the top 100 profiles a long time ago, as your work is just erased, like a sand castle is by the next tide. If this site wants to be more than just another porn database site, it needs structure and standards, but there also needs room for the 'I want to stick my tongue in her arsehole' element; they just need to be separated from each other. The overwhelming votes to hide certain comments show that there's an interest in this.

Posted by jeast 2026-09-22 06:52

Too much "democracy" is stupid just like in real life.

Posted by WhoreHoarder 2026-09-22 14:18

in theory I could see this working but in practice their is no way it will work as intended. How does someone dictate what is true or not without doing the research? I guarantee people wont do any before clicking approve or deny hence leaving to more "vibes-based" information which isn't known to be an accurate source.

I see this MAYBE working on higher rated models but in instance like Sophie Rain where she fakes a lot of information about herself, its unlikely the facts will be voted over the public misinformation a lot of models do for marketing purposes.

On the other hand however this would make it a whole lot more work for a field which is already neglected on most lower rated models.

Since half of bio's are usually just their numbers of followers on each social media platform, most approvals will just be accepting or denying if they gained followers.

A better suggestion would be something similar to Wikipedia where every change would need to input a source to back-up the information.

I see this MAYBE working on higher rated models but in instance like Sophie Rain where she fakes a lot of information about herself, its unlikely the facts will be voted over the public misinformation a lot of models do for marketing purposes.

On the other hand however this would make it a whole lot more work for a field which is already neglected on most lower rated models.

Since half of bio's are usually just their numbers of followers on each social media platform, most approvals will just be accepting or denying if they gained followers.

A better suggestion would be something similar to Wikipedia where every change would need to input a source to back-up the information.

Posted by jeffery101 2026-09-25 11:32