i did search but didnt find those posts. removing pubic hair is stupid because if lets say its ''old info of pubic hair'' or weight changed for the female. ok update the information if its old. in women things change even for her hair but if u go off the pictures shown on the profile as close as u can. you can get a good guess of what pubic hair to put. if they dont show it then put nothing. im not saying u got to make a page for the pubic hair category but like weight its not a page.
When searching, it's best to check 'Closed' to include the closed items. You would have found both then.
The main argument against the public hair field is that it can often change, and many women don't stick to one style. Another argument is that people fill it in, even when the model has never been naked.
Let's see what others think. Vote thumbs up if you think it should be brought back. Or down if you think it's better to keep it removed.
Some people didn't like it because it changes. Well, weight changes, too. Hair color changes, too. We shouldn't delete those, why would we delete pubic hair style?
It's a nice way to search for females who fit your preferences.
Yeah, but pubic hair changes the most and hair color would just default to the natural color. Easy, but with pubic I mean hell there is no real default. I mean it's really apples to oranges.
@Douggy510 Just because something changes doesnt mean it cant be a feature. Hair styles change but we dont count that. Pubic hair has a different style so it can be a thing. Sometimes bushy, shaved or triangle trimmed. Some guys like searching for those features the women has if its shown. Also its a pattern if the model has shown their pubic hair its gonna be common thru out there pubic hair style. In the case it isnt then give the common pattern not difficult. Just like hair color we dont always get that right or can tell if thats her natural hair color or not, but that gets told wrong too.
Just because u dont use it doesnt make it useless, its apart of the models body if its shown. Ignoring that is ignorant or just because gooners care doesnt mean it shouldnt to the majority. Also the ads are porn sites and its a option called 'performances' to check what the models history is.
Hair on the head is just a more relevant thing, on top of that, easier to pin down accurately and if you get that wrong it's fine. There are clearly more people against having it listed. Users en masse think it's stupid.
Also, often nobody would fill out that part. It was just taking up space. If anything, we need a pussy type. Like innie or outtie. But pubic hair? Can't justify it as it's only a razor away from being a shift back and forth changing far too often to matter.
Made a similar request without seeing this one. My thoughts:
It's been said "pubic hair style is worthless outside of porn." Well, since the advent of the "pubic wars" some 65 years ago it's been a significant aspect of life. Numerous males, and perhaps some females, have preferences on the hairstyle down there in those we find physically attractive. Yes, the style may change. Head hairstyle and weight can change, too. You want to remove those? That would be just silly -- let's just have a profile page with the model's name, her birth date (which can't change) and her credits.
It shouldn't have been removed. Like sure some out there change it often while others are known for their "hairstyle" down there. So if one changes it a lot between photoshoots then it must be stated the model changes their "hairstyle" often or it should be based on what she has in most of her content. Those searching for models who 9/10 times rock a bush will have a hard time searching now.
If it is brought back, please include an option for "alternating" to capture those who have sported more than one way. Or perhaps make the entries be checkboxes for which multiple values can be selected (or something similar to how "Performances" accommodates multiple values). But I agree that the previous system of only selecting one value was deficient.
@drusus Head hairstyle and weight can change, too. You want to remove those?
Of course profiles don't have a field for head hairstyle, that would be equally silly to have as pubic hair. And I agree that having precise weight doesn't make sense either, since the chance that it's right at any given moment is basically zero.
Comments (21)
https://www.babepedia.com/feedback/386/remove-pubic-hair-field-from-biography
https://www.babepedia.com/feedback/4/pubic-hair-info-makes-no-sense
Please search before posting ideas.
removing pubic hair is stupid because if lets say its ''old info of pubic hair'' or weight changed for the female. ok update the information if its old. in women things change even for her hair but if u go off the pictures shown on the profile as close as u can.
you can get a good guess of what pubic hair to put. if they dont show it then put nothing.
im not saying u got to make a page for the pubic hair category but like weight its not a page.
The main argument against the public hair field is that it can often change, and many women don't stick to one style. Another argument is that people fill it in, even when the model has never been naked.
Let's see what others think. Vote thumbs up if you think it should be brought back. Or down if you think it's better to keep it removed.
It's a nice way to search for females who fit your preferences.
It's been said "pubic hair style is worthless outside of porn." Well, since the advent of the "pubic wars" some 65 years ago it's been a significant aspect of life. Numerous males, and perhaps some females, have preferences on the hairstyle down there in those we find physically attractive. Yes, the style may change. Head hairstyle and weight can change, too. You want to remove those? That would be just silly -- let's just have a profile page with the model's name, her birth date (which can't change) and her credits.
Bring it back.
Head hairstyle and weight can change, too. You want to remove those?Of course profiles don't have a field for head hairstyle, that would be equally silly to have as pubic hair.
And I agree that having precise weight doesn't make sense either, since the chance that it's right at any given moment is basically zero.