Rejected
Having a month long poll for allowing Transwomen.
I would like to kindly ask for a real long month long poll to see where people really stand on this. Because I don't think a week or 2 would do such a big thing justice that would drastically change things. In the past each polling did go up for those who wanted Transwomen post op. So to make it fair in 2 ways this time I would like to see a longer poll and also place a point of concede where if the poll result swings past a threshold for the Transwomen, it would be honored even if NO is the highest still. Cause logic behind it is that if so many want them. it would be worth the upset to the NOs. It'd be recoverable. Example would be if No has 60% and Yes has 50% that would be a fair spread for saying ok the Yes broke 50% so let's go for it. What with voting shenanigans that may happen and stuff.
Comments (22)
We've already done polls that said no to trans there is no reason to do another. If you desire to look at trans there are other sites you can go to. There is no reason to include trans here as they are not and never can be a babe as they are not women. That's a very simple biological fact. And, since biology is a "hard" science (objective tests and objective results) it takes precedence over subjective flights of fancy that say that males can actually be females.
Personally I say no to include trans in Babepedia.com.
And I do believe that the OP is hoping that if he gets enough polls run that eventually the "No's" will get tired of voting and that trans will then be allowed.
It's kinda the best option you know. All the things said, plus, people that don't like shemales would probably downvote shemales to 1 or 2, just for the fact of being a shemale.
It doesn't matter if you "define" yourself something. If you attach to yourself a rotor blade you don't become assault helicopter - and no, I don't think we need another tag for that.
Boobpedia, despite it's name lists mainly bigger sizes. Even if I might not agree with them having such preference I won't petition a name change to "bigboobpedia" , or "bigboobonlypedia", nor will I demand including Gina Gerson or Keira Knightley there. It's just is what it is. So kindly please, leave "Babepedia" as it is, too.
There is no logic behind your proposal, you just think that the wishes of the minority need to take precedence over the wishes of the majority. If a clear majority don't want them why can't you deal with your hurt feelings and frequent any one of the myriad of sites that cater to your predilections?
I find it interesting that I can enjoy Babepedia and not feel the need to completely alter the sites you enjoy flooding them with "CIS" models till the point where what you had is unrecognizable. It's a very telling insight into the character of your culture.
Given the majority against this idea, we're marking it as rejected.