Official websiteInstagram accountOnlyFans Paid accountOnlyFans Free accountTikTok accountX account

Tina Friedrich

Also known as: Mary - Tina Nora - tinaa.nora More info on her aliases

Tina Friedrich alias list

Mary (Statement on her Instagram that her name is Mary)
Tina Nora
tinaa.nora - OnlyFans
⭐ 8.82/10 148 votes
Click To Rate
7462 Ranking Graph
#1 for 1 day
139
Times Favorited

Tina Friedrich Biography

Personal

Age: 39 years old
Born: Wednesday 28th of January 1987
Years active: 2023-present (started around 36 years old; 3 years active)
Birthplace: Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Nationality: (German)
Ethnicity: Caucasian
Professions: Adult Model, Fitness Model, Influencer, Model, Porn Star
Sexuality: Straight

Body

Eye color: Blue
Height: 5'7" (or 170 cm)
Weight: 121 lbs (or 55 kg)
Body type: Athletic
Bra/cup size: C
Boobs: Real/Natural

Performances

Solo: Nudity (Full), Masturbation, Dildo
Boy/girl: Blowjob, Vaginal, Creampie, Facial

Extra

Instagram follower count: 93k (as of May 2026)

Rate Tina Friedrich

Select a rating

Tina Friedrich Photos (Uploaded By Our Users)

Tina Friedrich Links

No links posted yet.

Leave a comment

Commenting is disabled for non-registered users. Please register and login if you want to leave comments.

User comments

Bueno, al final esta cosa si es artifitial intelligence o es real esta vieja??

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-14 02:29  🛈  

Reply to

He speaks Spanish as well... aren't you all impressed?

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-14 02:36  🛈  

Reply to

I've eaten better, thanks.

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-14 05:15  🛈  

This "German" looks way too North American to be a real German, so I agree with LeLoyon71 this is most likely an AI generated girl

Posted by Haven13 2026-05-12 14:35  🛈  

Reply to

Do you realize how many North Americans descend from Europeans who moved there ?
Honestly I couldn't imagine a German girl more German than this, the kind you could find serving exquisite beer at the Oktoberfest in Munich...


Posted by L4ser 2026-05-12 16:32  🛈  

Reply to

Makes no sense. Can you present some evidence, instead of just saying she is AI? We had cases here where people had evidence and profiles were taken down. I feel like she is AI, is not an argument. I'm not even saying she definitly isn't AI, but I think you have to provide some evidence, if you make the claim.

Posted by gooner98 2026-05-12 17:47 (edited 2026-05-12 17:51)  🛈  

Reply to

Too many are conflating edits with comments... they're not the same thing. Throwing an opinion out there isn't the same as sending a "this account is AI" or malicious request (not that those really work either... It's basically a dice roll if you get a response or get ghosted... but that's a different topic at hand).

Also, let's be honest... this high-Becky wouldn't have made it past one day at the top, regardless. Her appearance was just another example of the really low 25 vote threshold shooting someone to the top out of nowhere.


Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-12 18:32  🛈  

Again, guys? Many times are so many of you going to be tricked by AI models?

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-11 05:58  🛈  

Reply to

there are videos in Instagram page, does not seems to be AI model

Posted by sikendai 2026-05-11 06:29  🛈  

Reply to

Any proves?

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-11 07:06  🛈  

Reply to

Yes, there's plenty of proof, and I don't feel like, again, doing everyone else's legwork, to be honest. I say the same things over and over anytime an AI model, people doubt it, and then it ends up being true down the line... It's funny how that works.

Have any of you simply searched this computer generated thing on Google? Better yet, how do so many people fall for the same thing over and over, time and time again, never learning from their past mistakes? It comes up as AI in any direction that you go in, and so do the pictures.


Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-11 21:30  🛈  

Reply to

Any proves??

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-11 23:23  🛈  

Reply to

What did I just say?

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-11 23:25  🛈  

Reply to

Does it really matters?...

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-11 23:33  🛈  

Reply to

No, it doesn't, which is basically my point. Why all the fuss over someone suggesting that someone might be an AI model? I refrained from voting on it for a reason.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-12 00:12  🛈  

Reply to

I just asked a question, do with that whatever you want...

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-12 01:06 (edited 2026-05-12 01:07)  🛈  

Reply to

You did, I answered it, and I'm not going to answer it again.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-12 01:14  🛈  

Reply to

Good for you.

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-12 01:14  🛈  

Reply to

Next time, don't waste my time if you're going to weasel out and say nothing.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-12 03:50  🛈  

Reply to

That's your problem man, not mine...

Posted by Rustyday82 2026-05-12 10:04 (edited 2026-05-12 10:04)  🛈  

Reply to

Please don't make such posts without convincing proof.
By making such posts, you'll convince a small group of people to vote super low, causing her to drop to position #10000 tomorrow and never have a chance to rank high again.


Posted by Pryda (admin) 2026-05-11 09:48  🛈  

Reply to

I'm fairly sure that's what he wants.

Posted by mrdoctor 2026-05-11 20:45  🛈  

Reply to

I'm not jaded enough to care about who which person that doesn't know any of us exist makes it number one on a given day. People care about stuff like that are fucking losers... there's no nice way to put it.

I asked how many times the same people are going to be tricked by the same stuff, over and over again... All you're doing is assuming otherwise without any evidence. Would it make you happier if I just ever gave thousands of different models low scores like some kind of insecure herb?

Have you, or anyone else reading this, even tried Googling it? Based on what I've seen from people's comments over the years, I doubt that lifting a finger other than to play Elden Ring or WoW isn't in their playbooks.


Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-11 21:38 (edited 2026-05-11 21:41)  🛈  

Reply to

@Pryda

I didn't change anything, just simply making an opinion-based comment, which is literally what comments are for... opinions.

On that topic, their ARE unsourced edits going on that have been reported but not addressed, spite continuous reporting. Actual unsourced edits that continually undermine sourced edits should take precedent over simple, opinion-based comments, don't you think?


Posted by LeLoyon71 2026-05-11 21:27 (edited 2026-05-11 21:39)  🛈  

Reply to

The way you stated it sounds like you had proof that she's AI. Given your previous posts, you have built some authority when it comes to AI. So people are taking your post as truth and basing their vote on that. The average rating she received dropped from 8.56/10 (after ranking) to 7.15/10 after your post.

All I'm asking is to include your proof or be more nuanced. I'm still convinced this girl is real.

"Actual unsourced edits that continually undermine sourced edits should take precedent over simple, opinion-based comments, don't you think?"
I disagree. An editing war over an actress's current weight or peak-popularity weight (both of which can be considered correct) is far less damaging than labeling a newcomer girl AI-generated, right when her profile is most sensitive to low votes.

But I agree that we should discuss that topic as well, which is why I've created a blog post with a poll about it. Please check our most recent blog post.


Posted by Pryda (admin) 2026-05-12 19:39  🛈