☰

The model on this page is fake.

Official websiteInstagram accountOnlyFans account

Sofia Gadot

⭐ 8.04/10 118 votes
★ Click To Rate
▲ 55144 Ranking Graph
#1 for 1 day
120
Times Favorited

Sofia Gadot Biography

Personal

Age: 21 years old
Born: Saturday 9th of April 2005
Years active: 2023-present (started around 18 years old; 3 years active)
Nationality: (French)
Ethnicity: Caucasian
Professions: Artist, Influencer
Sexuality: Bisexual

Body

Hair color: Blonde
Eye color: Grey
Height: 5'7" (or 170 cm)
Measurements: 37–24–35 in (B–W–H) · WHR 0.67
Bra/cup size: 46D show conversions
Boobs: Real/Natural

Rate Sofia Gadot

Select a rating

About Sofia Gadot

Virtual Ai Influencer

Sofia Gadot Photos (Uploaded By Our Users)

Sofia Gadot Links

No links posted yet.

Leave a comment

Commenting is disabled for non-registered users. Please register and login if you want to leave comments.

User comments

Showing 1–10 of 11 comment threads

That's insane. I know this model! she was engaged with a football player of the team of my city. She modified her face with Ai or effects but it's her 100%. Her name is not Gadot, lier! she is trying to foolish us but not me

Posted by julisnot 2025-07-21 11:20  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

Please provide proof.

Posted by Pryda (admin) 2025-07-21 15:05  🛈  ⚠

I went to @sofia.gadot in Instagram. She is there. I can't tell you about the first photo.

Posted by sw2stl 2025-02-01 04:02  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

The AI model a guy created is there. Sofia Gadot doesn't exist lol.

Posted by Btotan 2025-02-01 09:04 (edited 2025-02-01 09:05)  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

@Btotan, we have removed your other comment. Please be respectful towards the other users.

Posted by Pryda (admin) 2025-02-02 20:58  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

real she is real. But she modified a little bit the face compared with pics of previous years

Posted by julisnot 2025-07-21 14:48  🛈  ⚠

fake useless shit and VERY obvious AI junk. Beyond obvious,not only based on shadow,but skin is fake, glance in eyes, it is so obviously poorly done AI that you gotta be blind and unable to differentiate humans from cheap photoshop to think this is real. And several more such on the top100 list.

Posted by Valiant_Duke 2025-01-30 16:31  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

I can name some of those profiles like Cristy Ren, Galina Dub, Moncheri Valerie, Alina Lando, Coco Nadia, Aliya Kiss, Lisa Bon, Emmy Rates are affiliated to the same modelling agency, Mavrin, even tho not "AI-generated" those "models" uses the same kind of filter on their pictures, even tho not too obvious at first glance, if you visited those profiles and look at their photos thoroughly, you will know what I mean

Posted by madvlads 2025-01-30 17:48  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

I disagree about it being obvious. AI is getting better and better. Look at the huge jump from Stable Diffusion to Flux. Also you must consider that most real models heavily filter their Instagram pics.

The dead giveaway was the name the AI creator gave her, has zero history. Then when you look more closely you can see the signs of AI. But that is getting harder and harder as AI improves.


Posted by MaxwellBond 2025-01-31 02:55 (edited 2025-01-31 02:58)  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

we everybody knows her before she broke up with the football player. I guess she just started again after brake up. Because before she couldn't have social because the bf was too jelous

Posted by julisnot 2025-07-21 14:51  🛈  ⚠

Why the **** is she #1 ?

Posted by zoodman 2025-01-30 11:37  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

Because she fooled many of us.

Posted by Pryda (admin) 2025-01-30 12:03  🛈  ⚠

100% AI. There is nothing if you search her name. Models who look like this just don't appear out of nowhere like she did last year. They always have a long history. Imagine Nata Lee just appearing out of nowhere in 2024 lol. Also notice the Onlyfans isn't verified. It's an interesting scam cause they also made a linked Instagram account trying to pretend she is an "artist" with clearly fake AI artwork. Of course it is asking for money.

We are going to see more and more AI girls like this. It's just getting easier to create a very convicing fake model and get a huge following on Instagram cause guys are horny and don't care. Then you can make money off your fake model.

Anyway this is what the "Virtual Influencer" Profession is for. It's for the AI models.


Posted by MaxwellBond 2025-01-30 10:01 (edited 2025-01-30 10:04)  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

Exactly. She was previously listed as a glamour model and artist, but she's simply an AI-generated virtual influencer. I have a few friends that are struggling artists, and it kind of pissed me off when I came across her Instagram. It's cool to make some AI art, but to try and sell it to lonely men? The same goes with her OnlyFans, which has zero content, but people have already subscribed and paid money for it.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2025-01-30 10:10  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

there is a difference of lonely men idiots imho, sorry to say. Because it is SO OBVIOUSLY FAKE, the photoshop and texture is so far from even remotely realistic. Sheesh.

Posted by Valiant_Duke 2025-01-30 16:34 (edited 2025-01-30 16:38)  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

I agree now that she is AI. She fooled me earlier because the videos on her Instagram look real. Upon closer inspection, yes, there are clear signs now that she is not real.

Now we're faced with a dilemma: Do we remove this page or keep it up to make people aware that she is not real?
She has many followers already and is probably making a good amount of money for her owners through OnlyFans, fake art, and coffee.


Posted by Pryda (admin) 2025-01-30 11:29  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

I'm not sure how it would be implemented, but this profile should not be on any list, ranking higher than actual women

Posted by zoodman 2025-01-30 11:40  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

Looking at the votes for today, I can guarantee she won't be in any top 100 tomorrow.

Posted by Pryda (admin) 2025-01-30 12:03 (edited 2025-01-30 12:03)  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

@Pryda

Personally, I think the "virtual influencer" tag should be enough for most people to realize that it's not a real person. and since that since that category exists, maybe deletion is too much... but it definitely wouldn't bother me if it was deleted. I don't know if it's possible, but maybe do something like making virtual influencer pages ineligible from the rankings? I don't know... it's just sone off-the-cuff ideas... Maybe some others have better suggestions.?


Posted by LeLoyon71 2025-01-30 12:20  🛈  ⚠

Well that is disappointing, AI only.

Posted by BlackxClaw 2025-01-30 09:14  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

It's getting harder and harder to detect it.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2025-01-30 09:45  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

harder? Come on guys, seriously? It is SO easy, and this is coming from someone who never even worked with photoshop professionally. It is so easy to tell based on the dead cartoon eyes and how unrealistic it is with backgrounds always,even photos.

Posted by Valiant_Duke 2025-01-30 16:40  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

@Valiant_Duke, we have removed some of your messages. Please be respectful.

Posted by Pryda (admin) 2025-01-31 13:17  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

@Valiant_Duke: Don't flatter yourself because you can make out some obvious ones. There are literally cybersecurity and OSINT classes on how to identify AI generated images—it's not easy at all and it's not getting easier.

Posted by mrdoctor 2025-01-31 13:49  🛈  ⚠

I'm usually of the mindset that a lot of these models that are suspected of AI are actually just heavily photoshopped, but out of curiosity and her lack of biographical data, I did a better searching.

There's absolutely nothing on this woman other than pictures, her origin and date of birth are non-existent, and she's not listed on any database or modeling agencies roster, The biggest thing of all that stuck out to me is that her supposed art page (IG @so_gadot_arte) are all just other photos that exist elsewhere, that whoever is running the account has altered with a cheesy AI filter app like Prisma or something to edit. They couldn't even be bothered to use the same signature on them!

The art is most certainly fake, and it's just there to gift suckers into buying them. An artist "she" is not, and it's a slap in the face of real artists. I also think that the model is fake... There's just way too many coincidences that, when put all together, make it almost undeniable.


Posted by LeLoyon71 2025-01-30 07:35  🛈  ⚠

Born April 1st? April Fools lol. I don't think she is real and is AI. Her IG was created just last year and she came out of the blue with no track record. Sure sign of AI. Thin blue eye blondes with massive perfect tits and supermodel faces don't appear out of thin air. Also the name "Sofia Gadot" has zero history if you search. There is a TikTok account with only 2k followers named "Sofia Gandot" with a N in the name now with this same fake model and is clearly AI videos.
 


Posted by Btotan 2025-01-30 06:21 (edited 2025-01-30 06:38)  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

Agreed

Posted by LeLoyon71 2025-01-30 07:18  🛈  ⚠

Born 2023, wtf?!? Is she a baby???

Posted by Sfhfssaaaa 2025-01-30 05:11  🛈  ⚠

Oops Supergirl 🦸! I think I fell in love with her⚡. But how long will she stay number one or be again 0️⃣?

Posted by John111 2025-01-30 03:26  🛈  ⚠

Reply to

You've been hornswoggled, my friend.

Posted by LeLoyon71 2025-01-30 07:37  🛈  ⚠