Alessia Uva
Alessia Uva Biography
Personal
Body
Extra
About Alessia Uva
As of May 2026, Alessia has amassed 301,000 followers on Instagram.
Alessia Uva Links
Leave a comment
Commenting is disabled for non-registered users. Please register and login if you want to leave comments.
User comments
Happy Birthday Beautiful. Absolutely GORGEOUS !
2025-06-24 13:09 🛈 ⚠
Shouldn’t be in the top 1000
2025-04-21 08:17 🛈 ⚠
Fake cans and she’s not even cute. #1? Jesus…
2025-04-21 06:41 🛈 ⚠
Those awful fakes ruin what could've been a 10, or at least in the realm of.
2025-04-21 02:16 🛈 ⚠
Another artificial push😔
2025-04-21 01:23 🛈 ⚠
That's a baseless accusation. We don't see anything pointing in this direction. Same for the nr 1 of yesterday (Riley Woods).
Users with a certain number of contributions to the site receive access to the voting sheet. They can click on the number of votes at the top of the page and see who voted, when, and what score they gave. I've given you access as well so you can check it yourself.
These sudden number ones result from how the site works: Newcomers don't get a rank until they have 25 votes. If she only gets 9s and 10s and maybe one or two 8s, then it's likely she reaches the top 25 or even #1. We have already implemented weighted ranking, but it still happens regularly.
It's true that in the past, we have had a few number ones where a user made multiple fake accounts to push a girl to the #1 spot. But we've succeeded in reducing this kind of manipulation. This year, we've only had one that reached the number one spot where voting manipulation was happening.
2025-04-21 01:57 (edited 2025-04-21 14:48) 🛈 ⚠
It's not artificial, but rather the threshold of how someone earns "rank" being relatively low... 25 votes, I believe.
2025-04-21 02:19 🛈 ⚠
There are pros and cons to increasing the threshold. Increasing it reduces the number of high newcomers, but it doesn't eliminate it. If we increase it to 30, 40, or 50, you'll still have high newcomers. A bit less, but they're not gone.
You have to keep in mind that some models take a year or longer to gather 25 votes. The people keeping an eye on the Rising Stars list are the ones pushing these high newcomers. They tend to rate new models rather high.
Then you have a small group of people who don't check that list but do watch the top 25, and they also feel like most high newcomers don't deserve a top 1000 rating, rating them 6/10 or lower. This often results in them dropping to positions far outside the top 1000.
Increasing the threshold also reduces the variation. A model like Alessia Uva may never reach the top 25 if we require 50 votes to rank, because there may be one person who gives her a 3/10 or two persons giving her a 6/10. Some models survive the high-ranking start and stay in or near the top 100. Some people like this variation and the surprises. Would you rather have a ranking where there is less variation and almost no chance of someone new reaching the number 1 spot or even the top 25?
2025-04-21 15:36 🛈 ⚠