Posted
A bit of criticism...
I’m going to offer some criticism regarding Babepedia. Basically, if a girl just has a Facebook or Instagram account, she ends up on the site. I think that’s completely wrong—what about the girl's consent, and so on? Another thing that really bothers me is that half the pages on Babepedia lack photos and sometimes even any data at all. It’s a bit off-base—I apologize—but that’s just how it is. Maybe it would be better to create a separate directory; instead of
I apologize, but that is my opinion.
https://www.babepedia.com/babe/name, you could use https://www.babepedia.com/processed/—well, that’s just my opinion. That way, at least the completed profiles would be displayed properly and fully, whereas I’m not sure if incomplete entries really belong on Babepedia at all.I apologize, but that is my opinion.
Comments (14)
That's not 100% accurate.
Follower requirement: Please only submit babes that have at least 5,000 followers on social media. Please don't submit babes that don't want to be famous.
User-suggested profile creations aren't the only way profiles are created. There is another route as well, in which the model, her agency, or a site/publisher that owns the photos asks for or permits us to create the profile page.
Empty profile pages are indeed a problem. We do clean these up, but probably not quickly enough.
The precise share of empty profiles is 12.3%, by the way.
I think they are talking about the babes that were added before that
1. No one is saying that we like "half of the website empty" despite @Pryda already telling you it's only at 12.3
2. You can do a load up of lists minus pictures
3. They already told you that they are cleaning it up and they admit to it not being as fast
4. You could I don't know go find said images and write bios for the babes that are empty
So far your critisms seem more like a temper tantrum
You might see that 12.3% as empty space, but to my eye, it looks like nearly half is missing—unfortunately, that is just how it appears. Furthermore, I am not attacking or scolding anyone; this was simply my critique and observation. We all have a right to our own opinions, and this criticism is intended to be constructive—to help things improve and evolve. Unfortunately, it seems you only read half of what I wrote—focusing solely on the criticism—while completely overlooking the proposed solutions. I want to emphasize once again: my opinion is just that—my opinion—and certainly not some kind of ticking time bomb. Thank you.
No I read all of what you wrote don't confuse me with you the fact is you had a bitch fit because 5 ppl said no
I just picture older dudes creeping on college/university accounts looking for 18 year old girls/students to add.
Good question. I guess we never thought about making a graphical version, and nobody ever requested it. The alphabetical listing is one of the earliest pages of the site (close to 20 years old now, lol). It was primarily designed to guide search engines. If you want a version with photos, you can submit that as a separate idea. If it gets a lot of votes, we'll consider it.