Being Considered
Students and malicious posts
I think that there should be a discussion about the description ‘student’ on this site. My experience is that students are the most vulnerable women on here to malicious posts. These are young women, not models, adult content creators, or celebrities.
The type of contributor who creates malicious posts usually creates a profile and immediately uploads pictures and profile information (see examples below) and is never seen again.
This can be mitigated by not allowing new members to create new profiles for either a period, or until after they have contributed, comments, votes, or edits. or even removing student as an option.
Thoughts?
EXAMPLE: malicious post about a 19 year old pre-med student.
“ Attends pre-med at Penn uni. Worked as a bottle girl for first few months of first year uni before stripping and escorting. Known for hooking up with guys are frats, she filmed over a dozen gangbangs - most of them with all the guys cumming inside her. She has not started an onlyfans, she distributes these irl and from her tiktok @ “
“X has not started an onlyfans, she distributes her sexual content and escorts irl and from her tiktok @
“In 5 hour uncut tape, she lets over 40 members of the frat run a train on her. It doesn’t stop until she makes them cum 100 times, displaying her slutty drive and passion content creation”.
X has filmed hundreds of sextapes - over a dozen of them being gangbangs. She quickly developed a reputation as a self proclaimed “cumslut”. She displays her creampie/breeding kink in the majority of her sextapes, nearly all of them featuring the man/men cumming inside her pussy. She is likely on birth control as she has not confirmed any sort of pregnancies.
The type of contributor who creates malicious posts usually creates a profile and immediately uploads pictures and profile information (see examples below) and is never seen again.
This can be mitigated by not allowing new members to create new profiles for either a period, or until after they have contributed, comments, votes, or edits. or even removing student as an option.
Thoughts?
EXAMPLE: malicious post about a 19 year old pre-med student.
“ Attends pre-med at Penn uni. Worked as a bottle girl for first few months of first year uni before stripping and escorting. Known for hooking up with guys are frats, she filmed over a dozen gangbangs - most of them with all the guys cumming inside her. She has not started an onlyfans, she distributes these irl and from her tiktok @ “
“X has not started an onlyfans, she distributes her sexual content and escorts irl and from her tiktok @
“In 5 hour uncut tape, she lets over 40 members of the frat run a train on her. It doesn’t stop until she makes them cum 100 times, displaying her slutty drive and passion content creation”.
X has filmed hundreds of sextapes - over a dozen of them being gangbangs. She quickly developed a reputation as a self proclaimed “cumslut”. She displays her creampie/breeding kink in the majority of her sextapes, nearly all of them featuring the man/men cumming inside her pussy. She is likely on birth control as she has not confirmed any sort of pregnancies.
Comments (11)
I would change it to college student but then again most of them are also influencers so.....
EDIT: I’ve also noticed a number of profiles for college athletes on here. I’m not sure that (for example) “wants to play soccer” equates to the “wants to be famous” requirement for creating profiles. Unless now I’m really over-thinking it.
I mean it's not technically a profession to begin with a profession is something one gets paid for and as I said most of them are influencers/content creators to begin with
I'm not saying it's the same thing, but why is Housewife listed as a profession? It's a valid thing to do instead of a job, but it's not a profession. Especially not in the context of this website.
Clearly, if an influencer, student or not (and they often are) she's demanding attention, so right to be here. An athlete in a public stadium is public, even if they sometimes object to be considered hot publicly, is fair game, unless they request to be removed. I'm not saying what's right or wrong, just pointing out the general axiom that this discussion is in.
We already have a 5k minimum follower requirement before adding people to avoid adding random hot students who don't want to be famous. But if people want this, we'll drop the student profession. We'll take action if this gets to a score of 50.
If anyone sees more cases of people clearly abusing the student profession, let us know, and we'll take action.