Feedback & Ideas › Add a Religious Category (christian, jewish, islam, etc) or a beliefs category for what these women believe in. Needs to be added would be interesting.
Posted
Add a Religious Category (christian, jewish, islam, etc) or a beliefs category for what these women believe in. Needs to be added would be interesting.
Similar to the relationship status, I'm voting thumbs down for two reasons: I don't think it's very interesting, and it wouldn't be good for the relationship between the models and Babepedia (further invasion of privacy).
Smh - Oh Dear GOD - NO.. seriously ppl? I voted "NO" (thumb down) BECAUSE 'religious status' has no bearing on how hot / sexy a BABE is.. Sigh. I from My PoV/IMO 'Babepedia' isn't a dating or model scouting site, Its an awesome 'Online (Eye) Candy store' (wiki-library) - period. Which is what makes it enjoyable & worthy of my time.
Tbh - I agree w/ 'PRYDA' - 'having a Religious category is redundant & not worth the risk'. As any of the babes (or their ppl) who know bout Babepedia probly ignore us as 'fan-wiki-site' & that's how it should be - as none of what's posted on here is OC or Licensed & some Agencies & Babes (especially Glamour houses, Playboy, etc.) have ppl to scout/scan internet for violations of Copyright & or Personal info.. lets stay under radar.
Religion has no place on a site like this! I believe ALL western religions are money making businesses and Babepedia would simply be supporting what amounts to criminal empires! Please stay away from religion! PLEASE! If there were gods would we have so many atrocities in this wold and guys like the ones running the world's three most powerful countries? They're three greedy madmen with the one in the white house the sickest one in the world. If there was a true all powerful being he would have been smitten long ago! NO RELIGION! I CAN'T IMAGINE ANY OF THE BABES ON MY FAVORITES LIST ARE DOING DPs ALL WEEK AND HEADING TO SERVICES ON THE WEEKEND ANYWAY! 😂😂😂
While I don’t often agree with @Oldsocalpunk , I’m with him and @Si1verF3nix360 (and @Pryda ) on this one. As Charles Schulz taught us, civil conversations should stay well away from Religion, Politics, and the Great Pumpkin. So that’s a 𝒃𝒊𝒈 thumbs 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 from me on this one. 👎🏻👎🏻
Comments (9)
We already have issues with actresses being overrated now you're looking at jew chicks being either a 1 or a 10 ?
I voted "NO" (thumb down) BECAUSE 'religious status' has no bearing on how hot / sexy a BABE is.. Sigh. I from My PoV/IMO 'Babepedia' isn't a dating or model scouting site, Its an awesome 'Online (Eye) Candy store' (wiki-library) - period. Which is what makes it enjoyable & worthy of my time.
Tbh - I agree w/ 'PRYDA' - 'having a Religious category is redundant & not worth the risk'. As any of the babes (or their ppl) who know bout Babepedia probly ignore us as 'fan-wiki-site' & that's how it should be - as none of what's posted on here is OC or Licensed & some Agencies & Babes (especially Glamour houses, Playboy, etc.) have ppl to scout/scan internet for violations of Copyright & or Personal info.. lets stay under radar.