Rejected

Profile photos

Images

Posted by ToksikBA 2025-12-18 05:23

I was wondering if you'd consider revising the criteria for uploading a profile photo? Sometimes I feel like the current criteria aren't very effective. I experienced this firsthand when uploading photos. While I usually carefully check everything required for a profile photo, I also often notice that my photos are rejected even though they meet the criteria.

👍 3 👎 0

Comments (14)

We're always open to feedback on how to improve our criteria and guidelines. Can you be more specific? What specifically is not effective? What do you disagree with? If it's too much to place here, you can email us instead.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2025-12-18 11:03

I'm not entirely happy with the photo criteria themselves. They're perfectly understandable, but sometimes they don't seem to quite work. I find the perfect profile photo, but it still gets rejected.

Posted by ToksikBA 2025-12-18 13:52

Can you give some examples of recently rejected photos that you thought were perfect?

Posted by Pryda Admin 2025-12-18 14:26

I can't provide these exact photos, but I can say they met the requirements. There's a chance I was wrong and they didn't meet the requirements, but I doubt it. I also don't quite understand the point of the criteria "Showing the entire body, or the entire upper body from face to crotch" and "Photos are preferred where she looks at the camera (eyes open)." Why not change the criteria so that a photo can be uploaded where the face is visible and slightly lower? And why does the gaze have to be directed specifically at the camera? How much of an impact does this have? I think the criteria could be relaxed a bit so that more profiles can have a photo.

Posted by ToksikBA 2025-12-18 16:33

The idea behind these upper-body, camera-facing, and open-eyes requirements is to have consistency. Then you can have a page like our Top 100, where you see 100 babes in a similar pose, looking at the camera. We believe it is a minor inconvenience for the uploader that greatly enhances the site. Our site would feel very different if the main profile photos were all over the place. I hope you understand and can accept this.

Again, if you can provide the names of the individuals behind those recently rejected photos, we can review the log and determine whether the reviewer made a mistake. Maybe we need to improve our criteria and guidelines.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2025-12-18 19:06

i find it way too time consuming trying to add pixs my self by the time your done editing the image gets so distored it ends up being rejected

Posted by noonecares 2025-12-23 11:05

look at my comments on this topic as well ive send e-mails over the years on this issue as well

Posted by noonecares 2026-01-09 16:26

I was discussing exactly this today (01/18/2026) with them via email. Even if you submit a clean image, free of defects, showing the woman’s entire body and in the required format, they still reject it.

Posted by mrsecretoo 2026-01-18 18:56

@mrsecretoo: Please give correct information. Your case is about something else. We didn't reject your image. We rejected your proposal (via the 'flag this profile' option) to replace the existing main profile photo with the user-uploaded photo you suggested. This is different, and there are no clearly defined criteria to replace an existing main photo with another one. The reviewer considers many factors: Does it meet the requirements? Is the photo objectively and subjectively better than the existing one? Did we recently replace the photo after another user's request? Could the page use an update as a refreshment?

After you insisted via email, we gave you what you wanted and replaced the 4th main profile photo with your suggestion.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-01-18 22:07

@Pryda Just to make it clear, the page I was trying to update with a new photo contained only images submitted by me. No other user submitted any content. I uploaded all of them myself, as well as suggested her profile. Additionally, I included some information that I am aware of. There is not, and has never been, any other user involved with that specific profile.

Posted by mrsecretoo 2026-01-19 19:07

@mrsecretoo: We don't look at who uploaded what previously when reviewing photo submissions and flags.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-01-22 12:24

The fact is that the image I am trying to update is flawless. There are absolutely no defects. It has greater height than width and clearly captures the woman’s full body. She is also looking directly at the camera in that image, exactly as required. The resolution is even higher than what is requested. Therefore, I do not understand what the difficulty is in updating such a simple image. Could you please be more specific and indicate exactly where the issue is? I have seen several profile photos where the angle does not even follow the standards you require, and yet they are still accepted. Please explain this inconsistency.

But enough discussion. You added the photo as one of the profile options, correct? So why is it not simply being set as the main profile picture? If it will not be updated, then adding it to the four main options served no purpose at all.

Posted by mrsecretoo 2026-01-22 16:15

Sorry to disappoint, but we don't have time to discuss why we didn't select your favorite photo as the first main profile photo. I've already elaborated on the why in my previous message here, from January 18. Since this discussion is a different topic from ToksikBA's idea here, let's just stop it here. We're already short-staffed and have other, more urgent priorities.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-01-22 22:57

I'm closing this one since there has been no activity lately.

Posted by Pryda Admin 2026-05-07 10:05