Posted
Blocking
I think we should be able to block babes with specific profile key words that dont appeal to the user... this will also give you a better idea of perhaps profiles that shouldnt be on this site due to fans dislike this would not only free up server space it can prevent msg fights that seem to pop up left and right on here when fans disagree over a profile .... maybe put it to a vote with the users
Comments (3)
You want to be able to block users using keywords, as well as any biography field (eg, body type = BBW, tattoos = yes).
You want these babes to be hidden from you. For example, if you block China, then any babes from China should be hidden, and all Chinese babes should be hidden in the Asian Top 100. If the top 5 are Chinese babes, then your personal Asian top 100 will start with #6.
If a Chinese babe has a gallery on our home page, you wouldn't see it.
Furthermore, if you land on a profile page that you have blocked (by finding the link through another site), you will see a message like "You cannot see this profile page because it matches one of your blocking keywords."
Is that what you had in mind?
My honest opinion:
1) This doesn't sound like a very useful feature. I think it's a very small minority that is interested in blocking whole profiles, just to avoid seeing them and being tempted to fight in the comments section. Most people are not fighting in the comments section and don't care. They come here, and they search for what they want to see. They don't get frustrated over what they didn't want to see.
2) Running Babepedia is a constant balancing act between adding features and keeping it fast & efficient. Having "block filters" integrated in dozens of places on the site (which would be required to implement this as described above) would require a significant amount of development time and substantially increase the server requirements. We will likely need to upgrade the server to ensure this works well. The total cost (in time and money) is substantial.
These two things make it sound to me like this is not an interesting new feature. But I'll leave the idea open. Perhaps others do show interest, or we find a more interesting variation through discussions.