Ashley Reed

Man, if you don't get the fuck outta here with that AI bullshit

1 star

Posted by Billy_Ray_ValentineReply3 02025-09-20 09:44  🛈  ⚠

Former pornstar? Any links to her vids for those?

Posted by Caddguy5Reply1 02025-05-02 16:56  🛈  ⚠

She’s so fake, I just pretended to wank onto a tissue

Posted by ShinjiReply1 12025-03-28 17:09  🛈  ⚠

Most, if not all, of her recent pics seem to be AI generated, but the videos are real. I'm guessing there's AI agencies which will create a LORA or TI based on your images and generate content using it, without you having to go to the trouble of actually shooting the content. Pretty smart tbh.

EDIT: on further inspection I'm starting to suspect the videos are deepfakes (NOT entirely AI generated, just deepfake). If so there's a chance this model as she currently appears on social media is entirely fabricated.

EDIT 2: OK I did more digging, she is entirely fake. I found an instagram post from the account "angeles_models1" which has a video showcasing her images with the description "Here is your perfect Christmas gift 🎁 Subscribe to our new model to watch the other side😈". However this appears to have been edited. Google, at the time of writing, preserves the original text in its page snippet: "Subscribe to our new AI model for hot and exclusive content ✨️". So this model is entirely an AI fabrication of angeles_models1.

The retired pornstar named Ashley Reed is real, however, and is a totally different person.

Posted by clearsoundReply4 12025-01-13 14:29 (edited 2025-01-13 14:45)  🛈  ⚠

Good observation. In fact; on her Twitter account you can see the model as she originally looks in older posts. The rest are AI-generated images based on her. There is even an AI video also based on her that a user took a screenshot showing how part of the background is distorted when she moves. I can safely say that whatever content she ends up offering is all AI based on her. Your comment helped me a lot in detecting that, but it's also that the images and videos in AI are still very perfectionist even in the backgrounds they show. She has moles on her skin that never appear again, abnormal body positions, small errors in her wrists, the outline of her silhouette is very blurred with a somewhat complex backgrounds. And in general; all the photos seem to be taken with the same camera and edited in the same way using exactly the same amount of light and that is not possible. Finally; you won't see letters [or very few] in AI-generated images; in this case there is nothing. Basic details to detect something real or generated with AI [for now].

Posted by RamonVMReply1 12025-02-21 10:15  🛈  ⚠

Still active as adult photo model. All pictures that I have seen show NO tattoos or piercing. Also boobs look larger than D and enhanced/fake. I rate her a 9.5

Posted by nyctrainmanReply1 12025-01-10 05:34  🛈  ⚠